“They were trying to play on blue versus red rather than the facts and the law.”Ī video played by the House’s impeachment managers - a compilation of footage from the riot - also appeared to leave a strong impression on senators. “I found their case to do everything that undermines our success as a republic,” he said. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) accused Trump’s lawyers of attempting to inflame partisan divisions within the Senate. That was not one of the finest I’ve seen,” Sen. “The first lawyer just rambled on and on and on and didn’t really address the constitutional argument. They talked about many things, but they didn’t talk about the issue at hand.” Castor’s meandering speech was widely mocked on social media, and even questioned by former Trump impeachment attorney Alan Dershowitz.Īfter Tuesday’s proceedings, there seemed to be bipartisan agreement that Trump’s lawyers did not advance the president’s case, even among Trump’s staunch supporters and the former president himself. “If I’m an impartial juror and one side is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror I’m going to vote for the side that did a good job.”Ĭassidy added that the Trump lawyers’ presentation was “disorganized, random. President Trump’s team, they were disorganized, they did everything they could but to talk about the question at hand,” Cassidy told reporters after the vote.
“The House managers were focused, they were organized … they made a compelling argument. The final vote was 56-44.Ĭassidy voted “no” on a procedural vote on a similar question last week, but appeared to have been swayed by the presentations on Tuesday. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) voted with five other Republicans and all 50 Senate Democrats that the upper chamber has the constitutional authority to hold an impeachment trial, even though Trump has left office. In one of the most surprising moments of the day, Sen. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the House’s lead impeachment manager - in which he discussed his experience during the January 6 riot - followed by a bizarre, rambling presentation by Trump attorney Bruce Castor. The afternoon began with a tearful speech by Rep.
JAMIE RASKIN YARMULKE TRIAL
Plus male-pattern baldness seems to come on young among those with Jewish genes, so bald and Jewish is always an option.Former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial kicked off Tuesday, though the substance of the issue - whether or not the Senate has the constitutional authority to hold a trial for a president no longer in office - was somewhat eclipsed by remarks from some of the starring lawyers. But a bald pate was more common than you’d expect, at least among Harvard and MIT’s doctoral candidates. Sometimes, it seems unlikely that a younger guy is bald enough to have a kippah-sized patch, so it must be a yarmulke, we’d think. This means there’s always space for a rousing round of “Jewish or just bald?” (There are also variations, such as “frum or bald?”)Įspecially among the younger community of 20- and 30-somethings living in the scholarly climes of Cambridge, it was a fine line - when moving about largely secular spaces, whether that be campus or the climbing gym, the game could so easily go either way. There is a sizable observant community there, but while it is close-knit, there is a constantly rotating cast of characters due to the stream of graduate students passing through Boston’s many universities at any given time. This mistake reminded me of a game played widely in my Jewish circle when I was in graduate school and living in Somerville, Massachusetts. As he turned his head slightly to gesticulate, the edge of his bald spot looked like a kippah.
JAMIE RASKIN YARMULKE FULL
As it turned out, Raskin was not wearing a skullcap he is just balding, with that particular kind of male-pattern baldness that leaves the appearance of a full head of hair from the front, but a surprisingly shiny pate from the back.
0 kommentar(er)
